Public benchmark

Engram vs AgentMemory

Compare Engram and AgentMemory on public LoCoMo memory tasks. Same-method results are shown where available, with methodology and limitations visible.

Engram92.19%
AgentMemory79.10%

The short answer

Engram is the better fit if

Choose Engram when one managed MCP memory should work across agents, repositories, and teammates, with explicit recovery after context compaction.

AgentMemory is the better fit if

Choose AgentMemory when local-first, open-source coding-agent memory matters more than a managed team service.

What this page does not prove

Retrieval was measured with the same public task. The answer-level comparison is not complete, so we do not infer a score.

Read the official AgentMemory documentation

What the numbers say

Side by side

Same public dataset and scoring method
+13.09 pp

Engram leads by 13.09 percentage points on R@50.

Not measured here

Not scored under the same answer method

Decision pointEngramAgentMemory
Primary product shapeManaged memory layer for agent teamsLocal-first memory for coding agents
Delivery modelMCP · Built inLocal CLI, hooks, and MCP
Cross-tool agent useSupportedSupported through MCP and hooks
Context-compaction recoveryBuilt inNot measured here
Team and cross-repo learningBuilt inNot measured here
Same-method answer evidenceSupportedNot measured here

Questions buyers ask

Were Engram and AgentMemory tested the same way?

The values marked as same-method use the same public LoCoMo task, candidate depth, and scoring rule. Product-published numbers from a different protocol are not mixed into this table.

Does the highest retrieval score automatically mean the best product?

No. Retrieval measures whether useful evidence appears in the candidate set. Answer accuracy measures whether that evidence helps produce the right answer. Operations, privacy, integrations, and cost remain separate buying decisions.

Which product should I choose?

Choose Engram for managed workspace memory and team learning. Choose AgentMemory when you prefer a local-first open-source coding-agent stack that you operate yourself.

Engram is measured two ways: first, whether it retrieves the right evidence; second, whether an LLM can answer correctly from that retrieved context.

We keep retrieval and answer accuracy separate. Both use public LoCoMo, but they measure different parts of the memory loop.

Support Loop

Help us make Engram sharper

If setup is confusing, a tool behaves strangely, or a pricing limit feels wrong, send it here. The message lands directly with us.

Feedback

Tell us what is missing

Bugs, confusing setup steps, pricing questions, and product ideas go straight to the Engram team.

10 more characters needed0/10